|
[12,39] τῆς γὰρ περὶ τὸ θεῖον δόξης καὶ ὑπολήψεως πρώτην μὲν
ἀτεχνῶς πηγὴν ἐλέγομεν τὴν ἔμφυτον ἅπασιν ἀνθρώποις ἐπίνοιαν, ἐξ
αὐτῶν γιγνομένην τῶν ἔργων καὶ τἀληθοῦς, οὐ κατὰ πλάνην συστᾶσαν
οὐδὲ ὡς ἔτυχεν, ἀλλὰ πάνυ ἰσχυρὰν καὶ ἀέναον ἐκ τοῦ παντὸς χρόνου καὶ παρὰ
πᾶσι τοῖς ἔθνεσιν ἀρξαμένην καὶ διαμένουσαν, σχεδόν
τι κοινὴν καὶ δημοσίαν τοῦ λογικοῦ γένους· δευτέραν δὲ λέγομεν
τὴν ἐπίκτητον καὶ δι´ ἑτέρων ἐγγιγνομένην ταῖς ψυχαῖς λόγοις τε
καὶ μύθοις καὶ ἔθεσι, τοῖς μὲν ἀδεσπότοις τε καὶ ἀγράφοις, τοῖς
δὲ ἐγγράφοις καὶ σφόδρα γνωρίμους ἔχουσι τοὺς κυρίους.
| [12,39] To resume, then : Of man's belief in the deity and
his assumption that there is a god we were maintaining that
the fountain-head, as we may say, or source,
was that idea which is innate in all mankind and
comes into being as the result of the actual facts and
the truth, an idea that was not framed confusedly
nor yet at random, but has been exceedingly potent
and persistent since the beginning of time, and has
arisen among all nations and still remains, being,
one may almost say, a common and general endowment
of rational beings.
As the second source we designate the idea which
has been acquired and indeed implanted in men's
souls through no other means than narrative accounts,
myths, and customs, in some cases ascribed to no
author and also unwritten, but in others written and
having as their authors men of very great fame.
| [12,40] τῆς δὲ τοιαύτης ὑπολήψεως τὴν μέν τινα ἑκουσίαν καὶ παραμυθητικὴν
φῶμεν, τὴν δὲ ἀναγκαίαν καὶ προστακτικήν. λέγω δὲ τοῦ μὲν ἑκουσίου καὶ
παραμυθίας ἐχομένην τὴν τῶν ποιητῶν, τοῦ δὲ ἀναγκαίου
καὶ προστάξεως τὴν τῶν νομοθετῶν· τούτων γὰρ οὐδετέραν ἰσχῦσαι δυνατὸν μὴ
πρώτης ἐκείνης ὑπούσης, δι´ ἣν βουλομένοις ἐγίγνοντο καὶ τρόπον τινὰ
προειδόσιν αὐτοῖς αἵ τε προστάξεις καὶ
παραμυθίαι, τῶν μὲν ὀρθῶς καὶ ξυμφώνως ἐξηγουμένων ποιητῶν
καὶ νομοθετῶν τῇ τε ἀληθείᾳ καὶ ταῖς ἐννοίαις, τῶν δὲ ἀποπλανωμένων
ἔν τισιν.
| [12,40] Of this acquired notion of the divine being let us
say that one part is voluntary and due to exhortation,
another part compulsory and prescriptive.
By the kind that depends upon voluntary acceptance
and exhortation I mean that which is handed down
by the poets, and by the kind that depends upon compulsion and
prescription I mean that due to the lawgivers. I call these secondary
because neither of them could possibly have gained strength unless
that primary notion had been present to begin with ;
and because it was present, there took root in
mankind, of their own volition and because they
already possessed a sort of foreknowledge, the prescriptions
of the lawgivers and the exhortations of
the poets, some of them expounding things correctly and
in consonance with the truth and their hearers notions,
and others going astray in certain matters.
| | |