| Texte grec :
 
 
  
  
   | [55,15] ὅταν δὲ περὶ τοῦ Πανδάρου, ὡς συνέχεε τὰς σπονδάς, ἐλπίσας
  δῶρα παρὰ Ἀλεξάνδρου τοῦ Πριάμου, καὶ οὔτε ἀπέκτεινε τὸν Μενέλεων 
  βαλών, καίτοι τοξότης ἱκανὸς εἶναι δοκῶν, καὶ παραβὰς τὰ
  ὅρκια τοὺς Τρῶας ἀθυμοτέρους ἐποίησε πρὸς τὸν πόλεμον μεμνημένους 
  ἀεὶ τῆς ἐπιορκίας·
  νῦν δ´ ὅρκια πιστὰ
  ψευσάμενοι μαχόμεσθα· τῷ οὔ νύ τι κάλλιόν ἐστι·
 (16) καὶ ὃν τρόπον ἀπέθανεν οὐ μετὰ πολὺ τὴν γλῶτταν ἀποτμηθείς,
  πρὶν ἢ καὶ λόγῳ φῆσαι τὸν Ἀλέξανδρον αὐτῷ χάριν εἰδέναι· ταῦτα
  διεξιὼν οὕτως ἐπιμελῶς ὑπὲρ ἄλλου του δοκεῖ λέγειν ἢ δωροδοκίας καὶ
  ἀσεβείας καὶ τὸ ξύμπαν ἀφροσύνης; ὃς καὶ τοῖς βέλεσι κατηρᾶτο καὶ
  ἠπείλει διακλάσειν αὐτὰ καὶ κατακαύσειν, ὡς φοβουμένων αὐτὸν τῶν βελῶν.
 (17)  ὅταν δὲ περὶ Ἀσίου τοῦ Ὑρτάκου, ὅτι τοῦ στρατηγοῦ κελεύσαντος 
  ἔξω τῆς τάφρου καταλιπεῖν τοὺς ἵππους μόνος οὐχ ὑπήκουσεν,
  ἀλλὰ σὺν αὐτοῖσιν πέλασεν νήεσσι θοῇσι
  νήπιος· {οὐδ´ ἄρ´ ἔμελλε, κακὰς ὑπὸ κῆρας ἀλύξας, 
  ἵπποισιν καὶ ὄχεσφιν ἀγαλλόμενος παρὰ νηῶν
  ἂψ ἀπονοστήσειν προτὶ Ἴλιον ἠνεμόεσσαν·}
 (18) εἰς τοσαύτην δυσχωρίαν τάφρου τε καὶ τείχους καὶ νεῶν εἰσελαύνων, 
  ὅπου γε μηδὲ τοῖς πεζοῖς συνήνεγκε καταληφθεῖσιν ὑπὸ τῶν
  ἐναντίων, ἀλλὰ ὀλίγης ἐκβοηθείας γενομένης διεφθάρησαν οἱ πλείους·
  ὁ δὲ ὑπὸ τῶν ἵππων ἐπαιρόμενος καὶ τῷ κάλλει τοῦ δίφρου ᾤετο
  μὲν ὑπὲρ τὸ τεῖχος ἐλάσειν, ἕτοιμος δὲ ἦν ἐμβαλὼν εἰς τὴν θάλατταν 
  ἀπὸ τοῦ ἅρματος μάχεσθαι· ἆρ´ οὖν οὐ περὶ ἀπειθείας καὶ
 (19) ἀλαζονείας τότε λέγειν φαίνεται; πάλιν δὲ τούτοις παρατιθεὶς
  Πολυδάμαντα κελεύοντα εὐλαβηθῆναι καὶ μὴ διαβαίνειν τὴν τάφρον,
  ἅμα μὲν τὸ πρᾶγμα ἐπιδεικνύντα ὡς ἐπικίνδυνον, ἅμα δὲ τὸν οἰωνὸν 
  τὸν γενόμενον αὐτοῖς· ἄλλως μὲν γὰρ οὐδένα ᾤετο ἀνέξεσθαι
  αὐτοῦ λέγοντος, σὺν δὲ τῷ οἰωνῷ τάχ´ ἂν πεῖσαι τὸν Ἕκτορα· ἢ
  τὸν Νέστορα τοὺς περὶ τὸν Ἀγαμέμνονα καὶ τὸν Ἀχιλλέα λοιδορουμένους 
  παύοντα τῆς ὀργῆς καὶ προλέγοντα φανερῶς τὰ συμβησόμενα 
  αὐτοῖς ἀπὸ τῆς στάσεως, ὕστερον δὲ ἐπιπλήττοντα τῷ
  Ἀγαμέμνονι ὡς ἁμαρτόντι καὶ ἀναγκάζοντα δεῖσθαι τοῦ Ἀχιλλέως·
  ἢ τὸν Ὀδυσσέα ἐπανορθούμενον τὸ ἁμάρτημα τοῦ Ἀγαμέμνονος, δι´
  οὗ πεῖραν βουλόμενος λαβεῖν τοῦ στρατοῦ, πῶς φέροιεν τὴν τοῦ
  πολέμου τριβήν, ὀλίγου φυγεῖν αὐτοὺς ἐποίησεν· οὐ περὶ φρονήσεως
  καὶ στρατηγίας καὶ μαντικῆς, πρὸς δὲ τούτοις καιροῦ καὶ ἀκαιρίας
  ἔοικεν ὑποτίθεσθαι; |  | Traduction française :
 
 
 
  
       
  | [55,15] And again, when he tells about Pandarus, how he 
violated the truce in the hope of rewards from Alexander 
son of Priam, and how he not only failed to slay 
Menelaüs by his shot, although reputed to be an able 
bowman, but also by violating the truce made the 
Trojans more discouraged as to the war through their 
constant recollection of their broken oaths—as witness 
these lines
"But now we fight as traitors to our oaths ; 
On that account 'tis not so well for us" —
and how not much later his tongue was cut off and 
he died before ever Alexander could even put into 
words his gratitude to him —in recounting these 
things with such scrupulous attention to detail, does 
Homer appear to you to be talking of anything else 
than of bribe-taking and impiety and in general of 
folly ? Why, Pandarus even cursed his arrows and 
threatened to smash and burn them, as if the arrows 
were in fear of him ! 
(17) Take another example. When Homer says of 
Asius son of Hyrtacus that, after his commander  
had given orders to leave the horses outside the 
trench, he alone did not obey,
"But with them neared the speedy ships, the fool !
Nor was he fated, dodging the spirits dire, 
To come again, exulting in team and car, 
Back from the ships to wind-swept Ilium,"
(18) driving into such difficult terrain amid trench and wall 
and ships, where even the men on foot found it not 
to their advantage when caught by the foe, but most 
of them were slaughtered when a small rescue party 
issued from within the gate ; yet Asius, elated as he 
was by his horses and the beauty of his chariot, though 
thinking to drive past the Wall, was prepared to 
plunge into the sea and to fight from his chariot —
think you not that Homer then is speaking of disobedience 
and boastfulness ?
(19) On the other hand, when he contrasts with these 
Polydamas giving orders to be cautious and not to 
cross the french, pointing now to the enterprise as a 
risky venture  and now to the omen they had had —
for he felt that, while no one would listen to his words 
in any other way, perhaps by the omen he might 
persuade Hector ; or, to take another illustration, 
when, as Agamemnon and Achilles are reviling one 
another, Homer depicts Nestor as trying to make them 
cease their rage, and foretelling plainly what will 
befall them in consequence of their strife, and later 
upbraiding Agamemnon as being in the wrong and 
forcing him to entreat Achilles  ; or again, Odysseus 
setting right the blunder of Agamemnon  through 
which, while wishing to test the army to see how it 
stood the war's delay, he almost brought about its 
flight—is it not likely that by scenes like these Homer 
is trying to give advice regarding prudence and 
generalship and prophecy, and, more than this, 
regarding tact and tactlessness ? |  |