[3,34] Αἱ δὲ τῶν Λατίνων πόλεις Ῥωμαίοις ἐγένοντο διάφοροι τότε πρῶτον, οὐκ ἀξιοῦσαι κατεσκαμμένης τῆς Ἀλβανῶν πόλεως τοῖς ἀνῃρηκόσιν αὐτὴν Ῥωμαίοις τὴν ἡγεμονίαν παραδιδόναι. ἐτῶν γὰρ διαγενομένων πεντεκαίδεκα μετὰ τὸν ἀφανισμὸν τῆς Ἄλβας πρεσβείας ἀποστείλας ὁ τῶν Ῥωμαίων βασιλεὺς εἰς τὰς ἀποίκους τε καὶ ὑπηκόους αὐτῆς τριάκοντα πόλεις ἠξίου πείθεσθαι τοῖς ὑπὸ Ῥωμαίων ἐπιταττομένοις, ὡς παρειληφότων αὐτῶν ἅμα τοῖς ἄλλοις οἷς εἶχον Ἀλβανοὶ καὶ τὴν ἡγεμονίαν τοῦ Λατίνων ἔθνους, δύο μὲν ἀποφαίνων τρόπους κτήσεων, καθ´ οὓς ἄνθρωποι γίνονται τῶν ἀλλοτρίων κύριοι, τόν τε ἀναγκαῖον καὶ τὸν ἑκούσιον, Ῥωμαίους δὲ λέγων καθ´ ἑκάτερον τὸν τρόπον παρειληφέναι τὴν ἡγεμονίαν ὧν εἶχον Ἀλβανοὶ πόλεων. πολεμίων τε γὰρ αὐτῶν σφισι γενομένων τοῖς ὅπλοις κεκρατηκέναι καὶ τὴν πόλιν τὴν ἑαυτῶν ἀπολωλεκόσι τῆς ἰδίας αὐτοῖς μεταδεδωκέναι· ὥστε καὶ ἄκουσιν Ἀλβανοῖς καὶ ἑκοῦσι προσήκειν ἐξεστάναι Ῥωμαίοις τῆς τῶν ὑπηκόων ἀρχῆς. αἱ δὲ τῶν Λατίνων πόλεις ἰδίᾳ μὲν οὐδὲν ἀπεκρίναντο πρὸς τοὺς πρέσβεις, κοινῇ δὲ τοῦ ἔθνους ἀγορὰν ἐν Φερεντίνῳ ποιησάμενοι ψηφίζονται μὴ παραχωρεῖν Ῥωμαίοις τῆς ἀρχῆς καὶ αὐτίκα αἱροῦνται δύο στρατηγοὺς αὐτοκράτορας εἰρήνης τε καὶ πολέμου, Ἄγκον Πουπλίκιον ἐκ πόλεως Κόρας καὶ Σπούσιον Οὐεκίλιον ἐκ Λαουϊνίου. διὰ ταύτας μὲν δὴ τὰς αἰτίας συνέστη Ῥωμαίοις ὁ πρὸς τοὺς ὁμοεθνεῖς πόλεμος, προὔβη δὲ ἄχρι πενταετοῦς χρόνου πολιτικός τις γενόμενος καὶ ἀρχαϊκός. οὔτε γὰρ ἐκ παρατάξεως ὅλοις τοῖς στρατεύμασι πρὸς ὅλα συμβάλλουσι μεγάλη συμφορὰ καὶ φθόρος ὁλοσχερὴς συνέβη οὔτε πόλις αὐτῶν οὐδεμία πολέμῳ κρατηθεῖσα κατασκαφῆς ἢ ἀνδραποδισμοῦ ἢ ἄλλης τινὸς ἀνηκέστου συμφορᾶς ἐπειράθη· ἀλλ´ ἐμβαλόντες εἰς τὴν ἀλλήλων γῆν ὑπὸ τὴν ἀκμὴν τοῦ σίτου καὶ προνομεύσαντες ἀπῆγον ἐπ´ οἴκου τὰς δυνάμεις διαμειβόμενοι τοὺς αἰχμαλώτους. μίαν δὲ πόλιν ἐκ τοῦ Λατίνων ἔθνους Μεδυλλίαν παλαίτερον ἔτι Ῥωμαίων ἀποικίαν γενομένην ἐπὶ τῆς Ῥωμύλου ἀρχῆς, ὡς ἐν τῷ πρὸ τούτου δεδήλωκα λόγῳ, μεταθεμένην αὖθις ὡς τοὺς ὁμοεθνεῖς πολιορκίᾳ παραστησάμενος ὁ τῶν Ῥωμαίων βασιλεὺς ἔπεισε μηθὲν ἔτι νεωτερίζειν· ἄλλο δ´ οὐθὲν ὧν οἱ πόλεμοι φέρουσι δεινῶν οὐδετέροις ἐν τῷ τότε συνέβη χρόνῳ. τοιγάρτοι ῥᾴδιαί τε καὶ οὐδὲν ἔγκοτον ἔχουσαι προθυμηθέντων Ῥωμαίων αἱ διαλύσεις ἐπετελέσθησαν.

[3,34] The cities of the Latins now became at odds with the Romans for the first time, being unwilling after the razing of the Albans' city to yield the leadership to the Romans who had destroyed it. It seems that when fifteen years had passed after the destruction of Alba the Roman king, sending embassies to the thirty cities which had been at once colonies and subjects of Alba, summoned them to obey the orders of the Romans, inasmuch as the Romans had succeeded to the Alban's supremacy over the Latin race as well as to everything else that the Albans had (p149) possessed. He pointed out that there were two methods of acquisition by which men became masters of what had belonged to others, one the result of compulsion, the other of choice, and that the Romans had by both these methods acquired the supremacy over the cities which the Albans had held. For when the Albans had become enemies of the Romans, the latter had conquered them by arms, and after the others had lost their own city the Romans had given them a share in theirs, so that it was but reasonable that the Albans both perforce and voluntarily should yield to the Romans the sovereignty they had exercised over their subjects. The Latin cities gave no answer separately to the ambassadors, but in a general assembly of the whole nation held at Ferentinum they passed a vote not to yield the sovereignty to the Romans, and immediately chose two generals, Ancus Publicius of the city of Cora and Spusius Vecilius of Lavinium, and invested them with absolute power with regard to both peace and war. These were the causes of the war between the Romans and their kinsmen, a war that lasted for five years and was carried on more or less like a civil war and after the ancient fashion. For, as they never engaged in pitched battles with all their forces ranged against all those of the foe, no great disaster occurred nor any wholesale slaughter, and none of their cities went through the experience of being razed or enslaved or suffer any other irreparable calamity as the result of being captured in war; but making incursions into one another's country when the cornº was ripe, they foraged it, and (p151) them returning home with their armies, exchanged prisoners. However, one city of the Latin nation called Medullia, which earlier had become a colony of the Romans in the reign of Romulus, as I stated in the preceding Book, and had revolted again to their countrymen, was brought to terms after a siege by the Roman king and persuaded not to revolt for the future; but no other of the calamities which wars bring in their train was felt by either side at that time. Accordingly, as the Romans were eager for peace, a treaty was readily concluded that left no rancour.